On 28 Jan 2012, at 11:00, Lester Caine wrote: > Michal Migurski wrote: >>> > (*) There is no final algorithm. There is "the best that OSMF can come >>> > up with" but it will have problems, and there*will* be things deleted >>> > which will be reinstated later, and there*will* be things kept which >>> > have to be deleted later after a complaint. In a way, the algorithm that >>> > OSMF comes up with is just a best guess, much like the algorithm >>> > currently used by the OSM inspector. >> >> Yeah, but it will come from the OSMF, which makes it authoritative. Unlike >> every other tool that has been suggested and developed. Since the algorithm >> will be so provisional at launch, there should be a parallel data and tile >> service set prior to launch and an old data set and tile service post-launch. > > Can I get a little clarity here ... > > I am assuming that 'undecideds' have until the 1st April to finally make a > decision? Which is an utter pain for me since the main blocks I have left now > are undecides. The 'declines' can simply be dealt with except where they are > wrapped in a large 'undecided' as well. > > Personally I would prefer to see anything left as 'undecided' simply switched > to a new user account called 'undecided'. If people have simply disappeared > or are simply not 'declining' just to be difficult, then they had their > opportunity to decline and didn't? So we just accept that work as clean.
Unfortunately, copyright doesn't work like that – to be allowed to copy something, you must have a license – they have not accepted the CTs, and thus not granted any license, so we can't use their work. Bob _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
