You can contact immap, feel free. and some other contributors are : tpginc.net/gis/albania/albania.php http://www.archive.org/details/AgimKompaniAlbaniaFiles http://osmopenlayers.blogspot.com/2010/04/agim-komani-data-online.html
GNS http://earth-info.nga.mil/gns/html/ geonames and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kosovo_Prishtina_Streets_Tracing and some more sources : http://www.disasterscharter.org/web/charter/activation_details?p_r_p_1415474252_assetId=ACT-286 http://www.mapaction.org/map-catalogue/maps.html?deployment_filter=191 http://www.zki.caf.dlr.de/applications/2010/Albania/181_en.html http://www.madmappers.com/htm/Ru500kDVD.htm see also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AlbanianFloodingCrisisCamp and http://www.archive.org/details/Prizren_City_Data and also we used kosovoguide.org and also inyourpocket.com and maps on mapwarper http://warper.geothings.net/users/436/maps here are some of them : http://warper.geothings.net/uploads/2590/original/shkodra_-24.png http://warper.geothings.net/uploads/2742/original/swsra9.jpg novo brdo also we worked on brod, also using the russian maps and other sources. also we have signatures from this guy for creative commons for shkoder. http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-March/003238.html mike On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Michael Collinson <m...@ayeltd.biz> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I read your 23 new ideas at http://fosm.ideascale.com/ and wish you luck > with them. I've now read your blog post. > > Once the license change is over, I am looking forward to engaging more with > Creative Commons. In direct talks we had with them last year, they have > definitely shifted from their stance that we should not use any SA license > for data so I am hopeful that we may be able to achieve CC compatibility in > a few years time. > > On the direct issue of contributions, I'll be happy to take on checking > license compatibility. I've considered approaching iMMAP but felt that might > be considered rather hostile to you. Can I therefore try and limit asking > your help to just three questions: > > 1) Are you happy if I write to iMMAP and ask their permission to use their > data in OSM? > > 2) Are there any imports from other agencies in your contributions, (I got > iMMAP from http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kosovo_iMMAP_Import) ? > > 3) I quite understand and agree that you cannot accept the CTs, (item 4 in > your blog). But you also then say below "I am not going to agree to any > contributor terms", I guess that means even if we were able to get > permission for the imports. If we were able to accurately identify your > personal work and/or get the necessary permissions for imports, how could we > proceed in a manner that is acceptable to you? Would transfer of > contributions, (probably specific change-sets or specific geographic areas), > to another account be OK for you? > > Kind regards, > Mike > > On 28/01/2012 16:23, Mike Dupont wrote: >> >> Well since you mentioned my name, h4ck3rm1k3 >> >> wanted to point out my blog post : >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/James%20Michael%20DuPont/diary/15777 >> >> I do not want to harm the project or the people in Kosovo and Albania >> where I personally did much work there. >> >> And considering that the team there is very healthy and continuing in >> Kosovo, I do not see any further personal work of mine being needed in >> Kosovo, I am not going to waste any more time or money on Albania, I >> do not see *any* chance there to start a community that is >> sustainable. >> >> you can re license *my* personal work, I don't care about that, and >> imports, you will have to just review them yourselves. >> >> dont expect me to be wasting time on understanding your new license >> scheme or checking compatibility, and I am not going to agree to any >> contributor terms. working on hosting my own changesets in blogposts, >> we will talk in some years about creative commons compatibility. >> >> spent enough time on this license stuff, and wish you all the best of >> luck. >> >> mike >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Michael Collinson<m...@ayeltd.biz> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I certainly support your sentiment but I suggest 99% is too high. >>> >>> We have, in rounded figures, 1,200M nodes in the database. [1] >>> >>> Here are just three decliners [2] who definitely are not going to agree >>> in >>> any form, have very high proportions of imported nodes and which WTFE is >>> also certainly marking all or most for removal. I've also added in old >>> anon >>> contributions as we've probably already reached all those we can. >>> >>> argath 7 025 025 100% POI import as far as I am aware >>> ABS2006 2 498 993 100% boundary import >>> anon edits 560 467 (may be too high as some previous anon >>> mappers have actually agreed) >>> h4ck3rm1k3 348 274 High but unknown import proportion in a >>> geographically concentrated area >>> >>> This gives 10.4M nodes or roughly 0.86% of the entire database. Add in a >>> few >>> other smaller and harder to quantise examples from around the world and >>> that >>> is the one percent right there. >>> >>> Caveat: I have done nodes because it is easiest, an analysis of highway >>> ways >>> might be better for the standard you are suggesting. >>> >>> There is a trade-off. The longer we leave it the more unproductive >>> over-editing occurs and many folks in problematic areas are not going to >>> map >>> what appears to be already there. >>> >>> I'd certainly like to see these examples removed right now if the >>> respective >>> communities agree. But that is only rational if we have consensus that >>> critical mass is here. >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stats >>> >>> [2] http://odbl.de/world.html >>> >>> >>> On 27/01/2012 21:19, LM_1 wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I would have higher standard for critical mass, definitely over 99 %. >>>> There should be a prolonged (at least one year) period where it is >>>> known what data can remain and what cannot to allow seamless switch. >>>> Having two months to the planned switch and still not knowing the >>>> exact algorithm to determine what stays seems just stupid. >>>> >>>> Lukas (LM_1) >>>> >>>> 2012/1/27 Michael Collinson<m...@ayeltd.biz>: >>>> >>>> >>> >>> [cut] >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> talk mailing list >>> talk@openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>> >> >> >> >> > > -- James Michael DuPont Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk