On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Павел Фомин <pavel...@yandex.ru> wrote:

> Arrrgh. We should have rules on mapping disputed areas and partially
> recognised countries. Is OSM showing the internationally accepted situation
> or is it taking into account every single front line?

Seems to be inconsistent.  For example:  Scotland and Wales get
boundaries, but North American locales with similar sovereignty like
the Cherokee Nation and Navajo Nation don't.

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to