NopMap wrote: > It's good that most of Britain has been processed, but it > appears that the two areas containing London have failed > repeatedly. As they probably contain the most complex > data and highest density, I think they are critical and if > they cannot be processed I'd expect the bot to run into > trouble in most large metropolitan areas in Europe.
I believe the London (west) one was an issue with an odd relation: there's special-case handling in the code for multipolygons, and this relation had been a multipolygon at one point in its history but not at another. This has been fixed so will should succeed on a future pass. As Robert has mentioned, London (east) has succeeded. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Update-on-redaction-bot-and-minutely-diffs-tp5716307p5716818.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk