On 18/09/2012 13:42, Vincent Privat wrote: > What happened on 15th september looks like an abuse of authority to me, > as this largely exceeds the limits of the mandate given to the DWG. I > expect a clarification from the OSMF board on this point.
OK, if we're playing WikiLawyer pissing games, the statement about DWG's power says "authorised", not "limited to". Part of DWG's remit is to deal with disputes, and this is very clearly a dispute over data. Ergo... -- Jonathan (Jonobennett) _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
