On Oct 15, 2012, at 1:39 PM, "Dave F." <dave...@madasafish.com> wrote: > Wouldn't it be better if you spent your time mapping?
Hah! Good one! I love hearing everyone's "you should do OSM like I do" dictums. Always entertaining. Oh, be sure to tell us how to quantify and measure "good" for OSM, so we'll know what's "better". Be sure to explain your metrics, including how to quantify the obligatory "build the community" mantra (unless, of course, your criteria doesn't include that; I won't presume to know). I wonder how one could measure the amount of fun injected into and sucked out of a project. There's gotta be some social science math in there somewhere. Very interesting... > There seems to be a hell of a lot of ancillary stuff going on around OSM. There sure is. Isn't it awesome? It's like people are actually having fun with OSM. > Maybe a 'Back to Basics' push might not go amiss. Actually, that is a really good idea. Let us know what you come up with. I'm curious about your plans on how you're going to engage more people to get involved to make OSM better. Interesting times for OSM these days! -Alan _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
