2014-03-03 13:19 GMT+01:00 moltonel 3x Combo <molto...@gmail.com>:
> The disambiguating word is "initially". I explicitly say that > separating nodes is an improvement. I'm trying to make it clear that > "glued vs separate" is a "good vs better" issue, not a "wrong vs > right" one. Some users will say that good tagging does not need to be improved. For newbies glueing polygons to roads will very likely not be good, since they might experience problems improving the roads and therefore leave the project. So I would prefer to say that glueing polygons to roads versus separating is a "mediocre versus preferred" issue 2014-03-03 15:08 GMT+01:00 moltonel 3x Combo <molto...@gmail.com>: > On 03/03/2014, Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2014-03-03 13:19 GMT+01:00 moltonel 3x Combo <molto...@gmail.com>: > >> The disambiguating word is "initially". I explicitly say that > >> separating nodes is an improvement. I'm trying to make it clear that > >> "glued vs separate" is a "good vs better" issue, not a "wrong vs > >> right" one. > > > > So if someone starts gluing separated nodes, she is making the data > worse, > > Yes, that's my thoroughly-convinced POV. For the reccord, we're only > talking about a specific kind of node-sharing here, not node-sharing > in general (read the archives if in doubt). > > > and we can be mad? > > As always in any community, discuss the issue before you get "mad". I > do get annoyed at other contributors sometimes, but only after 1) > repeated "offense" after the initial contact and 2) lack of dialog > despite my best efforts (which sadly is more frequent than I'd have > expected). > > Speaking of discussion and getting mad, are we done with this thread > yet ? Seems like everything has been said... > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
