talk

Messages by Date

2023/03/14 Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Marc_marc
2023/03/14 Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Pierre Béland via talk
2023/03/12 Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Marc_marc
2023/03/12 Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings john whelan
2023/03/12 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #659 2023-02-28-2023-03-06 weeklyteam
2023/03/12 Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Warin
2023/03/11 Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Frederik Ramm
2023/03/05 Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings john whelan
2023/03/05 Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Isaac Boates
2023/03/05 [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings John Whelan
2023/03/05 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #658 2023-02-21-2023-02-27 weeklyteam
2023/02/28 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Warin
2023/02/28 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Warin
2023/02/27 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Dave F via talk
2023/02/27 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/02/27 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Philip Barnes
2023/02/26 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Warin
2023/02/26 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #657 2023-02-14-2023-02-20 weeklyteam
2023/02/26 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Martin Koppenhoefer
2023/02/26 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/02/26 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Warin
2023/02/26 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/02/26 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/02/25 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/02/25 Re: [OSM-talk] Test Import of forum.osm.org to community.osm.org Grant Slater
2023/02/25 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Martin Koppenhoefer
2023/02/25 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Andy Mabbett
2023/02/25 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Martin Koppenhoefer
2023/02/25 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/02/25 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/02/25 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Martin Koppenhoefer
2023/02/25 Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Martin Koppenhoefer
2023/02/25 [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/02/25 Re: [OSM-talk] Test Import of forum.osm.org to community.osm.org Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/02/22 Re: [OSM-talk] Announcement: OpenAirportMap Paul Norman
2023/02/21 [OSM-talk] Test Import of forum.osm.org to community.osm.org Grant Slater
2023/02/21 Re: [OSM-talk] Announcement: OpenAirportMap Stephan Knauss
2023/02/21 Re: [OSM-talk] outaage 18/02 umap.openstreetmap.fr Spike
2023/02/21 Re: [OSM-talk] outaage 18/02 umap.openstreetmap.fr Marc_marc
2023/02/19 [OSM-talk] outaage 18/02 umap.openstreetmap.fr Marc_marc
2023/02/19 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #656 2023-02-07-2023-02-13 weeklyteam
2023/02/15 Re: [OSM-talk] "Stadium" map roulette challenge causing issues David Haberthür
2023/02/14 Re: [OSM-talk] "Stadium" map roulette challenge causing issues Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/02/14 [OSM-talk] "Stadium" map roulette challenge causing issues Andy Mabbett
2023/02/12 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #655 2023-01-31-2023-02-06 weeklyteam
2023/02/12 Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Warin
2023/02/11 Re: [OSM-talk] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base Mike Thompson
2023/02/11 Re: [OSM-talk] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base Greg Troxel
2023/02/11 Re: [OSM-talk] [automated edit] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Marc_marc
2023/02/11 Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Martin Koppenhoefer
2023/02/11 Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Tobias Knerr
2023/02/11 Re: [OSM-talk] [automated edit] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/02/11 Re: [OSM-talk] [automated edit] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/02/11 Re: [OSM-talk] [automated edit] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning john whelan
2023/02/11 Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning stevea
2023/02/11 Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Zeke Farwell
2023/02/11 Re: [OSM-talk] [automated edit] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Marc_marc
2023/02/11 Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning john whelan
2023/02/11 Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Brian M. Sperlongano
2023/02/11 Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/02/11 [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/02/10 Re: [OSM-talk] [talk-au] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base Andrew Davidson
2023/02/10 Re: [OSM-talk] [talk-au] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base Andrew Davidson
2023/02/10 Re: [OSM-talk] [talk-au] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base forster
2023/02/10 Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-ie] Mapping of footpaths and cycleways Dave Foley
2023/02/10 [OSM-talk] Announcement: OpenAirportMap Daniel Korn
2023/02/10 Re: [OSM-talk] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base Andrew Harvey
2023/02/10 Re: [OSM-talk] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base Greg Troxel
2023/02/09 Re: [OSM-talk] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base john whelan
2023/02/09 Re: [OSM-talk] [talk-au] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base stevea
2023/02/09 Re: [OSM-talk] [talk-au] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base Andrew Harvey
2023/02/09 [OSM-talk] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base rob potter
2023/02/09 [OSM-talk] consultation on list moderation Mikel Maron
2023/02/05 Re: [OSM-talk] AT&T Email Mike N.
2023/02/05 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #654 2023-01-24-2023-01-30 weeklyteam
2023/02/02 Re: [OSM-talk] Dubious websites added to tourist attractions? Andy Townsend
2023/02/02 Re: [OSM-talk] Dubious websites added to tourist attractions? Niels Elgaard Larsen
2023/02/02 Re: [OSM-talk] Dubious websites added to tourist attractions? Brian M. Sperlongano
2023/02/02 [OSM-talk] Dubious websites added to tourist attractions? Dave F via talk
2023/01/30 Re: [OSM-talk] AT&T Email Grant Slater
2023/01/30 Re: [OSM-talk] AT&T Email Tom Hughes via talk
2023/01/30 [OSM-talk] AT&T Email Mike N.
2023/01/29 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #653 2023-01-17-2023-01-23 weeklyteam
2023/01/22 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #652 2023-01-10-2023-01-16 weeklyteam
2023/01/20 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Allan Mustard
2023/01/20 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Dave F via talk
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? MoiraPrime via talk
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Adam Franco
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Russ Garrett
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Jeremy Harris
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Dave F via talk
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Pierre Béland via talk
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? john whelan
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Nick Whitelegg via talk
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? john whelan
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Nick Whitelegg via talk
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Martin Koppenhoefer
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? John Whelan
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Jóhannes Birgir Jensson
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Niels Elgaard Larsen
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Marc_marc
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Marc_marc
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Ilya Zverev
2023/01/19 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Martin Koppenhoefer
2023/01/18 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Warin
2023/01/18 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Paul Johnson
2023/01/18 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Clifford Snow
2023/01/18 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Brian M. Sperlongano
2023/01/18 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? stevea
2023/01/18 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? john whelan
2023/01/18 Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? stevea
2023/01/18 [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? john whelan
2023/01/15 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #651 2023-01-03-2023-01-09 weeklyteam
2023/01/10 [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Carto release v5.7.0 Paul Norman
2023/01/10 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Minh Nguyen
2023/01/10 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Snusmumriken
2023/01/09 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Yves via talk
2023/01/09 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Snusmumriken
2023/01/09 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Greg Troxel
2023/01/09 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Andy Townsend
2023/01/09 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Snusmumriken
2023/01/09 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Yves via talk
2023/01/09 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Niels Elgaard Larsen
2023/01/09 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Andy Mabbett
2023/01/09 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Greg Troxel
2023/01/08 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #650 2022-12-27-2023-01-02 weeklyteam
2023/01/06 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Martin Koppenhoefer
2023/01/06 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Niels Elgaard Larsen
2023/01/06 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Yves via talk
2023/01/06 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Sören Reinecke
2023/01/06 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Snusmumriken
2023/01/06 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Ed Loach
2023/01/06 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/01/06 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Snusmumriken
2023/01/06 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Frederik Ramm
2023/01/06 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Sören Reinecke
2023/01/05 Re: [OSM-talk] Public Rights of Way overlay missing Richard Fairhurst
2023/01/05 [OSM-talk] Public Rights of Way overlay missing Ranasinghe, Jas via talk
2023/01/04 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Marc_marc
2023/01/03 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Greg Troxel
2023/01/03 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/01/03 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' stevea
2023/01/03 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Frederik Ramm
2023/01/03 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Simon Poole
2023/01/02 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Martin Koppenhoefer
2023/01/02 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Andy Townsend
2023/01/02 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Shawn K. Quinn
2023/01/02 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' stevea
2023/01/02 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2023/01/02 Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Frederik Ramm
2023/01/02 [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Sören Reinecke
2023/01/01 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #649 2022-12-20-2022-12-26 weeklyteam
2022/12/31 Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to increment or decrement house numbers Alan Mackie
2022/12/31 Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to increment or decrement house numbers Florian Lohoff
2022/12/29 Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to increment or decrement house numbers Alan Mackie
2022/12/29 Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to increment or decrement house numbers Steve Friedl
2022/12/29 [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to increment or decrement house numbers Andy Mabbett
2022/12/25 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #648 2022-12-13-2022-12-19 weeklyteam
2022/12/23 Re: [OSM-talk] Upcoming downtime on 2022-01-22 Paul Norman
2022/12/23 [OSM-talk] Upcoming downtime on 2022-01-22 Paul Norman
2022/12/21 [OSM-talk] List moderators now on forum as well Allan Mustard
2022/12/18 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #647 2022-12-06-2022-12-12 weeklyteam
2022/12/17 Re: [OSM-talk] validated osm by linux fondation ? Stephan Knauss
2022/12/17 Re: [OSM-talk] StateOTMap 2015 video is "private" Bryce Cogswell via talk
2022/12/16 Re: [OSM-talk] StateOTMap 2015 video is "private" Minh Nguyen
2022/12/15 [OSM-talk] validated osm by linux fondation ? Marc_marc
2022/12/11 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #646 2022-11-29-2022-12-05 weeklyteam
2022/12/11 Re: [OSM-talk] razed railways and other things that don't exist today stevea
2022/12/11 Re: [OSM-talk] razed railways and other things that don't exist today Warin
2022/12/05 Re: [OSM-talk] razed railways and other things that don't exist today Mike Thompson
2022/12/05 Re: [OSM-talk] razed railways and other things that don't exist today Minh Nguyen via talk
2022/12/05 Re: [OSM-talk] razed railways and other things that don't exist today Zeke Farwell
2022/12/05 Re: [OSM-talk] razed railways and other things that don't exist today Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2022/12/05 Re: [OSM-talk] razed railways and other things that don't exist today Warin
2022/12/04 [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #645 2022-11-22-2022-11-28 weeklyteam
2022/12/01 Re: [OSM-talk] StateOTMap 2015 video is "private" Minh Nguyen
2022/12/01 Re: [OSM-talk] StateOTMap 2015 video is "private" Michał Brzozowski
2022/11/30 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Simon Poole
2022/11/30 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Minh Nguyen
2022/11/30 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Tobias Knerr
2022/11/30 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Tobias Knerr
2022/11/29 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) John Whelan
2022/11/29 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Dave F via talk
2022/11/29 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) John Whelan
2022/11/29 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Dave F via talk
2022/11/29 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Tobias Knerr
2022/11/29 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Simon Poole
2022/11/29 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Greg Troxel
2022/11/29 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Greg Troxel
2022/11/28 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Simon Poole
2022/11/28 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Simon Poole
2022/11/28 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) john whelan
2022/11/28 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Minh Nguyen
2022/11/28 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Tobias Knerr
2022/11/28 Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Simon Poole
2022/11/28 Re: [OSM-talk] QA tool for finding nameless highways that are armchair-fixable David Haberthür
2022/11/28 Re: [OSM-talk] QA tool for finding nameless highways that are armchair-fixable Lukas Toggenburger via talk
2022/11/28 [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template) Amanda McCann
2022/11/28 Re: [OSM-talk] QA tool for finding nameless highways that are armchair-fixable Mateusz Konieczny via talk
2022/11/28 Re: [OSM-talk] QA tool for finding nameless highways that are armchair-fixable Florian Lohoff