Are you aware there's a separate wiki page for 'Layer'? No wonder users get confused!

I suggest these pages are combined into a page called 'Layer' as most users wouldn't search for 'Key:*'

On 09/03/2014 10:30, Richard Z. wrote:
Hi,

for some time now I have been working on the wiki page to state the rules
as clearly as possible.. hope that most of the improvements are fairly
uncontroversial. Some of the changes:

* the vertical ordering established by the layer values is valid exactly only
   in the point where the ways cross or objects overlap

* define layer as higher value means above, lower value means bellow. Avoid
   the complicated layer=0 definition as "the natural ground level as it
   would be shown by contour lines on a topographic map". Explicit layer=0
   seems to be deprecated now.

* layer on ways should be used only in combination with one of tunnel=*, 
bridge=*,
   highway=steps, highway=elevator, covered=* or indoor=yes. For areas, it could
   be used in combination with tags such as man_made=bridge, building=* and 
similar.
   The motivation for this is to make it easy for validators to spot errors such
   as when the wrong segment is accidentaly tagged, bridge/tunnel forgotten, or
   someone tags excessively long ways for no good reason - common problem with
   waterways and elevated roads/railroads.
   I have validated this rule for ways in large parts of the world, there are
   exceptions which currently I do not know hot to tag better but those are 
rare.

* in some cases "level" may be more appropriate than "layer"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key%3Alayer&diff=999107&oldid=935491


Richard

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to