Pieren writes: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Frank Little <frank...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > Richard Z wrote > > > As mapped, the waterway=stream (Way #138911739) runs underground > > (layer=-1), > > probably through a culvert given the way the stream left and right are > > separately outlined as waterway=riverbank (and without layer=*). The way > > (stream) should be tagged as a culvert. > > > > Perhaps there is in reality a bridge not a culvert, in which case the road > > needs splitting and the appropriate new road segment tagged as bridge=yes. > > > > In either case, a layer tag is not needed for rendering. > +1
Nonetheless I add one out of habit. But I would be happy to stop, because as noted, the bridge or culvert carries an implicit layering. > Bridge or culvert, one way has to be split (the road for bridge or the > stream for culvert) My rule of thumb here is how it looks from above: if the people on the top would perceive it as a bridge, I split that way and mark is as a bridge. Otherwise I split the waterway and mark it as a culvert. -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
