I think if someone in a community wants to volunteer for this kind of job, I
think he/she would be welcome to the DWG.
For language reason, he would certainly endorse local issues, but with a larger
view: remember that OSM is a global project.
Imagine the fun in dealing with someone not happy with the local DWG
complaining to a main DWG ...
On 14 avril 2014 13:57:43 UTC+02:00, maning sambale
<emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Dear everyone,
>
>This is a thorny issue bit will ask anyway. ;)
>
>Not very often, but we do encounter questionable contributions.
>Normally, local mappers would contact the specific contributor to
>explain and provide guidance. But in some cases, these messages were
>ignored and the contributor continues to do questionable edits.
>
>There is a DWG [0] to resolve such issue. We do understand that DWG
>members are volunteers like most of us and local issues might not get
>attention immediately. I would like to discuss the possibility for
>our local chapter/community to form our own sort of DWG where we can
>address local concerns/disputes.
>
>We have a few active and trusted volunteers who can discuss and
>resolve such issues. But in rare occasions we think we should have
>the rights to do "temporary blocks" within our local areas.
>
>[0] wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
>--
>cheers,
>maning
>------------------------------------------------------
>"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
