2014-07-01 11:53 GMT+02:00 Pieren <pier...@gmail.com>: > Perhaps we don't have to go so far. I would suggest a compromise : > render differently "open access for the public" (access=yes or absence > of tag), "forbidden access for the public" (access=no or > access=private) and "conditional access, whatever it is" (destination, > permissive, forestry, type of vehicle, etc). >
I believe that this is not possible to do consistently with current actual tagging (if "the public" isn't just cars) (and available tags in rendering db): we don't have needed subtags available in the db (like vehicle, motor_vehicle, motorcycle), albeit a plethora of relevant tags does indeed get imported: foot, bicycle, horse, motorcar, access (based on this style sheet, not sure if it is the actual one: https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/blob/master/default.style ). And there are still many instances of access=no, bicycle=yes, foot=yes, etc. where a motor_vehicle=no/private/destination would be more appropriate. As a sidenote, I won't see "permissive" as conditional access, as this should make no difference to the user compared to "yes" for practical reasons. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
