On 29 August 2014 16:33, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > To use one of your examples were you claim that > manual intervention is required: a name that has a > so common spelling that it is used in that form in > wikidata, clearly should have that spelling in OSM > proper too
St John's St John's Church St John's Parish Church Saint John's Saint John's Church Saint John's Parish Church Church of St John Church of Saint John etc. etc. We can't account for every possible permutation. > As has already been pointed out: the whole effort cannot > be about moving information that belongs in OSM to > the database of a completely separate > project with different goals and structures. Indeed. Who has suggested it should be? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
