Roland Olbricht <roland.olbricht <at> gmx.de> writes:
> > This underpins the two theses: > > 1. The solution with ";" is far more established than the solution with > prefix "alt_name_". > > 2. It is altogether a sometimes but not often used feature. The TIGER import used name_n istead of alt_name_n. Have any data consumers got a preference for one or the other? -- Andrew _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
