It would indeed be preferable to use OSM Notes for that purpose. Jo
2015-01-26 17:37 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com>: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk> > wrote: > >> On Mon Jan 26 07:37:57 2015 GMT, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: >> > >> >> The locations I field checked were all findable, but had positioning >> errors >> >> consistent with smartphone GPS units, >> >> up to 30 meters. In each case I was able to find the station in a >> field >> > I think this is a good example of where notes are the way to go. A >> badly positioned node is only likely to be spotted by a mapper who is >> specifically interested in bike repair stations, whereas a note will be >> spotted and acted upon by a more general mapper visiting an area. The note >> can contain info on how to tag or a reference to one that has been properly >> surveyed. >> > > It seems messy, but I could import the 500 repair stations each with a > 'note' that says it needs field checking. > Would people really want that? > > --- > > This still won't find all the wacky ways people have tagged existing > stations (e.g. bike rack with capacity zero). But > might focus attention on the bike infrastructure in the area of the note. > > > _______________________________________________ > Imports mailing list > impo...@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk