Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> writes: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk> wrote: > >> I think this is a good example of where notes are the way to go. A badly >> positioned node is only likely to be spotted by a mapper who is >> specifically interested in bike repair stations, whereas a note will be >> spotted and acted upon by a more general mapper visiting an area. The note >> can contain info on how to tag or a reference to one that has been properly >> surveyed. >> > > It seems messy, but I could import the 500 repair stations each with a > 'note' that says it needs field checking. > Would people really want that?
I would not. It feels like spamming the notes database. If the positions are doubtful enough that a note is warranted for each node, that's a clue that the import shouldn't happen. Also, if a tag isn't rendered in the default mapnik view, then those elements are unlikely to be cleaned up (absent a special render for a community of interest, which the cyclemap layer might be).
pgpENx6m4bYZB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
