Am 12.02.2015 um 14:27 schrieb malenki: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:08:37 -0500, Tom MacWright wrote: > >> Ever since 2012, in the second commit ever, "Not breaking other >> people's data" has been one of the three clearly stated public design >> goals of iD. > > Regarding this statement it is interesting that iD went live with no > graphic hints about the existence of relations. (I hope I remember > this point correct.)
+1 Well, methinks thou dost protest too much. I did mention all my points longer time ago and there exists open issues about them. Still do not see the point why some actions should not be denied until they proper work especially as there seems to be not much interest in fixing them. I just was ask by an user of iD how to check the consistency of common relations like multipolygon, boundary and route in iD. Does anyone have an answer ? Where do I find a wiki or help system about iD explaining me the software ? Only found one page which does not even mention relations. I have no problems with newbie mistakes but users with over 2000 commits are no newbies anymore but still miss the common understanding of relations and are not aware of all tags of an object. What do you say about changesets with comment "hopefully did not break any relation this time" or "sorry about breaking relations" ? I would say, nice the user is at least adding changeset comments but as an developer alarm bells should start ringing in my head. For sure, I use PM and directly discuss on changesets but so far my advice is at least do not use "combine ways" or merging nodes at all, plus always discuss in advance of deleting or even better use a better editor software. Cheers colliar
0xE8F56581.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
