Ok a few people are agreeing that a relation is needed to assist the routing engine to provide higher quality instructions (with routing left unaffected). That's good.
I'd like to get something in the wiki and ideally get it approved (this is not an invite to talk about the wiki or the approval process - I've heard it all before). Question: Should I revive the "through_route" proposal or start a new one under a different name, say "route_continues" (or just "continues") so as to avoid any ambiguity with the use of "through route" in general language? Cheers, Rob
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
