>Agree. I dont think it should be a hardline stance of local vs remote. There should be balance. For example, remotely mapping roads is useful for us since it provides an initial framework for newbies to add POIs.
Indeed, I've written up the same experience with remote building tracing: http://hotosm.org/updates/2012-09-24_from_remote_tracing_to_field_mapping_in_padang Photo'd: https://twitter.com/iknowjoseph/status/248298952661811201 Cheers, Joseph On 15 June 2015 at 12:40, maning sambale <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > There is no remote mapper that I know of that believes they can produce > a better map than a local can ... Sharing the remote burden all over the > world instead of a small local populace, probably with limited internet > connectivity, hardware and leisure time - to me that can only be a good > thing. > > Agree. I dont think it should be a hardline stance of local vs remote. > There should be balance. For example, remotely mapping roads is useful for > us since it provides an initial framework for newbies to add POIs. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
