On 15/08/15 20:59, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > For rendering purposes, I would use a fill mainly for the landcover, while > the names (and no fill) would come from natural. Landuse would be mainly for > specialist maps, but of course this is up to the rendering style devs to > ultimately decide.
Having been investigating the 'farmland' problem ... and it is a PROBLEM ... I would tend to agree with that. The local blocks of farmland are a conglomeration of landcover and changing sections to the ACTUAL cover is going to be difficult. I do need to delete major blocks, but putting them back is even harder work. The areas not 'block mapped' have all of the field structure in place, but no 'farmland' boundary while the directly adjacent areas have multipolygon structures which can not be easily isolated to add all the fine detail of field boundaries. My quick fix for any new rendering is simply to switch off 'farmland' so that the tree blocks it masks actually display. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245442613 is an example of the problem, as are the adjacent areas to the right, while to the left the brown areas are the local farm yards and the majority of the remaining cover is farmland. trying to fill that with blocks of landcover is what seems wrong here ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
