sent from a phone
> Am 15.08.2015 um 13:50 schrieb Christoph Hormann <chris_horm...@gmx.de>: > > The question is how much is actually gained from this when > landuse=forest and natural=wood are practically identical anyway and > mean the same, namely 'this area is densely covered by trees'. > Rendering landcover=trees as well would just further fragment tagging. IMHO it would rather encourage mappers to make more sense out of these than it is now. I'm myself adding a pointless landuse=forest for every landcover=trees now (for the renderer), and I guess most other mappers do the same. I will remove them from non-forests as soon as the landcover tag becomes visible _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
