W dniu 17.08.2015 13:20, Warin napisał(a):
On 17/08/2015 7:20 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
In that case it is perfectly OK to do not edit map and keep it as it
was (yes, as I
understand it and it seems to be a widely used in this way -
landuse=wood, natural=wood,
landcover=trees are used currently for the same objects).
Err disagree, they are not the same.
To me "landuse=wood" (or landuse=forestry) imply that the area is
used to produce wood products.
There are areas that have trees .. that are NOT used to produce wood.
Here I would use natural=wood (or tree/s), landcover=trees.
There is also one more important factor: tag usability (aka mapper
friendliness).
How the mapper should know what type is it really and what should she do
when she doesn't know all the details?
--
"The train is always on time / The trick is to be ready to put your bags
down" [A. Cohen]
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
