On 17/08/2015 7:20 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
In that case it is perfectly OK to do not edit map and keep it as it
was (yes, as I
understand it and it seems to be a widely used in this way -
landuse=wood, natural=wood,
landcover=trees are used currently for the same objects).
Err disagree, they are not the same.
To me "landuse=wood" (or landuse=forestry) imply that the area is used
to produce wood products.
There are areas that have trees .. that are NOT used to produce wood.
Here I would use natural=wood (or tree/s), landcover=trees.
Probably landuse=forestry and landcover=trees would be a good idea and
I would
support such proposal.
2015-08-17 10:58 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com
<mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>>:
sent from a phone
> Am 17.08.2015 um 01:30 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny
<matkoni...@gmail.com <mailto:matkoni...@gmail.com>>:
>
> I am not aware about values that should be used in that case.
you are saying that landuse=forest is not a good tag to describe
an area where trees have just been logged and will soon be planted
again?
cheers
Martin
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
