On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:22:01 +0100 "Dave F." <dave...@madasafish.com> wrote:
> On 08/09/2015 13:56, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 13:37:47 +0100 > > "Dave F." <dave...@madasafish.com> wrote: > > > >> This is one reason I believe linear ways tagged as man_made=bridge > >> should be rendered: > >> man_made=bridge > >> bridge=* > >> historical=railway > > Please, see definition of man_made=bridge on the wiki. > > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge > > > > "The tag man_made=bridge is used to tag a bridge defined by the > > outline of the bridge." > > > > See also "Used on these elements" > That may the (restrictive) way it's used now but please explain why > it can't be expanded to include linear ways? > > You're advocating the use of man_made=bridge but don't want it > rendered for the way the *vast* majority of these bridges will be > mapped - as linear ways. Why? Please, see definition of man_made=bridge on the wiki. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge "The tag man_made=bridge is used to tag a bridge defined by the outline of the bridge." Outline of bridge is by definition an area, not way or node. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk