2015-10-08 9:39 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>:
> > 2015-10-08 4:12 GMT+02:00 Clifford Snow <cliff...@snowandsnow.us>: > >> If the bus travels over the same way going two different directions, is >> the way added twice to the relationship, which means ignoring the JOSM >> warning message? Or is the way only entered once with just no >> forward/backward direction? > > > > > After adding lots of bus routes (literally hundreds) and trying the > different options, a mapper colleague in my area told me that the best way > would be to use distinct relations for both directions and eventually > combine them in a third relation. He used combined relations before but now > has converted all of them to the new scheme. > > Here's an example: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1693163 > http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1693164 > > Masterrelation to tie them together: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2208235 > > If you use backward and forward roles the situation becomes rather opaque > and much more difficult to spot errors. > True, I think we're all moving away from trying to use 1 relation to describe all the possible variations of the routes. The only issue I see with your route relations is that they don't have a public_transport:version=2 (JOSM's validator will complain about that) and that the platform nodes got the role=stop. Polyglot
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
