In my opinion objects with abandoned prefix should be introduced in nominatim for searches and in mapnik to see them (with a different render obviously). OSM can be an important database also for stats about abandoned buildings/houses in our cities. Some organization (also the public administration) can be interested in research and exploitation of these places and OSM can be a great base. Il 05/Gen/2016 13:29, "Mateusz Konieczny" <matkoni...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:14:25 +0100 > John Doe <theguest...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I tagged some abandoned building in my native city with > > abandoned:building=yes (as wiki) and the building name but now i can't > > search these ones with nominatim (no results) and none of these > > appears on mapnik. > > Is prefix abandoned before building=yes really correct? > > "I tagged some abandoned building in my native city with > abandoned:building=yes" > > I think it is mistake. abandoned: prefix makes sense for things like > shops where there is a fundamental difference between active shop (POI > - it is possible to buy something there or provides some services). > > abandoned:shop, abandoned:amenity is solely an orientation point. > > In case of buildings there is no such fundamental difference between > used and unused one. >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
