Ok i agree, the rendering is not so important and i can use other tools, but why i can't search abandoned stuff with nominatim? this is not so logic in my opinion. If the data is present why i can't find it with a regular search on openstreetmap.org for example? this is not a rendering problem. Il 06/Gen/2016 06:40, "Marc Gemis" <marc.ge...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> As soon as you record the data it is in the database, it doesn't > matter whether it is rendered on the standard map or not. > I think that if you need "stats" on abandoned buildings or shops, that > you will load the data into your own database or a GIS system such as > QGIS, where you can really analyse and visualise the data. > Another quick solution for visualisation would be to use Overpass > Turbo or Overpass in combination with umap. No need to wait until > others do the work for you :-) > > > regards > > m > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:42 PM, John Doe <theguest...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In my opinion objects with abandoned prefix should be introduced in > > nominatim for searches and in mapnik to see them (with a different render > > obviously). > > OSM can be an important database also for stats about abandoned > > buildings/houses in our cities. > > Some organization (also the public administration) can be interested in > > research and exploitation of these places and OSM can be a great base. > > > > Il 05/Gen/2016 13:29, "Mateusz Konieczny" <matkoni...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > >> > >> On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:14:25 +0100 > >> John Doe <theguest...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > I tagged some abandoned building in my native city with > >> > abandoned:building=yes (as wiki) and the building name but now i can't > >> > search these ones with nominatim (no results) and none of these > >> > appears on mapnik. > >> > Is prefix abandoned before building=yes really correct? > >> > >> "I tagged some abandoned building in my native city with > >> abandoned:building=yes" > >> > >> I think it is mistake. abandoned: prefix makes sense for things like > >> shops where there is a fundamental difference between active shop (POI > >> - it is possible to buy something there or provides some services). > >> > >> abandoned:shop, abandoned:amenity is solely an orientation point. > >> > >> In case of buildings there is no such fundamental difference between > >> used and unused one. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > talk mailing list > > talk@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
