Hi, On 03/20/2016 10:56 PM, Stefan Keller wrote: > But Shapefile remains an oldtimer with more drawbacks than limited > field names; see [1]. > GeoJSON (ascii) and GeoPackages (binary) are formats which are more > suited for the job. > I still have hope that JOSM will be able to read those vector formats too.
Frankly, whenever I venture into the brave new world of Spatialite, I come back to good old shape files after a while for performance reasons. I'm not sure if Geopackage has significant performance improvements over simple Spatialite but if it hasn't then my recommendation for simple GIS processing is certainly to stick with shape files for the time being - despite all their shortcomings. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
