On 16/07/2016 07:20, Greg Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Alejandro S. <alejandro...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Looks like somebody making automated edits without checking by survey what
they are doing...
I think it should be reverted.
Kind regards,
Alejandro Suárez
4.) Edit 7, the edit under dispute, Wynndale removes the
highway=crossing tag following the first sentence of the wiki page and
the rest of the paragraph.
I think you're putting to much importance on the wiki & not enough about
what's on the ground.
Wynndale to an incorrect tag & made it worse (to correct it the removed
tag would have to be re-added & then crossing=no removed.
The geographic spread strongly implies he didn't have local knowledge
for them all.
So how about coaching the mapper verses reverting the changeset or
making an allegation.
He's made over 1400 edits since 2009.
Even the original tagging is wrong.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Why would
you want to revert a change that is right based on the wiki to
something that is wrong to begin with?
Because it's wrong with what's in the real world. I'm proposing to
revert this changeset & then ask on Talk-gb if those local to the
amendments can clarify what is the correct tagging to use.
Dave F.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
