On 19/07/16 15:26, Dave F wrote:
On 19/07/2016 14:01, Greg Morgan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com>
wrote:
Because it's wrong with what's in the real world. I'm proposing to
revert this changeset & then ask on Talk-gb if those local to the
amendments can clarify what is the correct tagging to use.
NO! I am putting the emphasis on the bullying that is going on in the
community under the guise of correctness.
I'm struggling to see how asking for other's opinions could be
regarded as bullying. I'm endeavouring to make the OSM database as
accurate as possible. When I see edits that make it worse I will query
it. That's not bullying,
I suppose that reverting a changeset could be seen as "insulting" or
demotivating. To me, a better approach would simply be to let it go (why
waste some time on thirty nodes ?), or if you want correct-it yourself.
IMHO, going on a war that could result in the original author loosing
his motivation is far worse than maybe putting wrong information on 24
nodes. I mean: there are far worse errors in OSM that this.
Best,
B.B.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
