While I can understand adding WP and WD tags to objects of note, why on earth would we want to add all this redundancy to OSM objects at all? Particularly given that object type + brand(s) should essentially always be unique, anybody that wants to look up WD keys could do so via a simple external table.
Simon Note I'm talking about the usefulness for OSM here, that it would be useful for WD is clear. Am 27.09.2017 um 00:47 schrieb Yuri Astrakhan: > Here is a query that finds all wikidata IDs frequently used in > "brand:wikidata", and shows OSM objects whose "wikidata" points to the > same. I would like to replace all such wikidata/wikipedia tags with > the corresponding brand:wikidata/brand:wikipedia. Most of them are in > India, but there are some in Europe and other places. This query can > be used directly from JOSM as well. > > http://tinyurl.com/y72afjpy > > BTW, this type of queries might be good for maproulette challenges > once they can work more like osmose. > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
