2017-11-02 10:24 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>: > > I like the landcover=trees idea, but this does not describe the > complete picture. I also want t be able to indicate what is between > the trees: ground, grass, grassy plants, bushes. > And when is something landcover=trees + bushes and when > landcover=bushes + some trees ?
+1, some ideas: 1. this could be mapped as "surface" with the disadvantage that "surface" values are typically detailed, so it would impose the burden of doing detailed mapping on the mapper 2. a new tag (e.g. "ground_cover") to say how area near the ground is made. This tag would have more generalized values than what we find in "surface". Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
