I replied to joosts mail here https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2018-February/005082.html
Am 20.02.2018 um 08:57 schrieb joost schouppe: > This discussion shows once again how great we are at generating smart > ideas. That definitely is not our problem. But all ideas are equal and > will only get executed if the one who posited them executes them. As > the project becomes more complex, that means you can either play in a > corner by yourself, or try to effect change as an individual. It also > means power to the devs and the time-rich, not to the community at > large. None of which is optimal. > We need a way to turn a thread into competing ideas, and to turn > winning ideas into actions. I'm not sure how we can do that, but I'm > enthousiastic about Bryan Housel's just-do-it project of using a > github issue tracker for that (see his position statement for the > OSM-US elections [1]). I agree with emacsen that having such things > run by a single developer is probably the worst possible solution, but > I think this is a good enough idea to be worth a shot for being > organised at OSMF level. > > > 1: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bhousel > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
