> That's one of my original questions. What (if any) data consumers are using this data/tags? > > If some popular site/app was using it to display a map that's one thing. If no-one is using the data, and many data contributors (mappers) are using "unisex=yes" as gender neutral, then it doesn't matter if the wiki says "it's the same as gender segregated"! 🙂 > > I haven't found any sites/apps/projects using this data/tags.
Proud to say, my alma mater University of California, Santa Cruz, has had various versions of its campus map based on OSM, and they highlight gender neutral bathrooms. "unisex=yes" is the tag used there.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1951346808 The application of the tag is not consistent across the campus, so is a prime location to engage for a mapping effort. -Mikel * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron On Thursday, April 26, 2018, 3:18:45 AM EDT, Rory McCann <r...@technomancy.org> wrote: On 26/04/18 01:00, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > If most existing data is using unisex to mean "there are both male and > female toilets", then it doesn't matter one bit what the wiki says. > Reusing the tag to mean "there are gender-neutral toilets" will cause > confusion with that existing data. That's one of my original questions. What (if any) data consumers are using this data/tags? If some popular site/app was using it to display a map that's one thing. If no-one is using the data, and many data contributors (mappers) are using "unisex=yes" as gender neutral, then it doesn't matter if the wiki says "it's the same as gender segregated"! 🙂 I haven't found any sites/apps/projects using this data/tags. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk