What I see most often is a room with toilets for men, another room with toilets for women and a toilet for people with disabilities, usually a somewhat higher pot in a relatively big room with a larger door. The last one is gender neutral, of course. I don't think anyone maps that explicitly, as it goes without saying.
If there is only 1 toilet, wouldn't it always be gender neutral? Are we soon going to find 4 different toilet doors in buildings, male, female, disabled and "something else"? Jo 2018-04-26 1:00 GMT+02:00 Nicolás Alvarez <nicolas.alva...@gmail.com>: > 2018-04-25 19:21 GMT-03:00 Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de>: > > On 25.04.2018 15:23, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> Unisex=yes is defined as a shortcut for male=yes + female=yes > > > > This may be a stupid question, but where are you all getting this > > definition from? > > > > I assumed the key already had the meaning that Rory is suggesting here. > > And at least on the Key:unisex and Tag:amenity=toilet wiki pages, I see > > nothing to contradict that. > > > > The former page mentions that the tag implies male=yes and female=yes, > > but "implies" should not be confused with "is equivalent to". > > If most existing data is using unisex to mean "there are both male and > female toilets", then it doesn't matter one bit what the wiki says. > Reusing the tag to mean "there are gender-neutral toilets" will cause > confusion with that existing data. > > -- > Nicolás > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
