Perhaps let me add my 2c: In my mental model there are two cases in which plus codes attain different semantics: a plus code as an encoding of latitude and longitude, and a plus code written on an sign above a door or on a house. If you asked me I'd say the first should not be ingested into a database and the second is not really different than any other street number if the database aims to reflect the ground truth.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Tom Lee <t...@mapbox.com> wrote: > I'm surprised to see that this conversation has made it past the weekend. > Since it has, let me add my voice to those suggesting that encoding OLC in > the database (or any other values that can be algorithmically derived from > geometry) makes very little sense. I'm grateful to everyone who has already > made this point, in various ways and with various levels of forcefulness. > > If the folks advocating for OLC would like to walk through the rationale > some more or explore alternative ways of getting OLC into their workflow, I > suspect that a number of people on this thread would be happy to talk > through it, myself included. Please don't hesitate to email. > > Tom > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
