2018-11-23, pn, 18:57 Andy Townsend rašė: > Where that best matches the situation on the ground about who has > control, yes.
Ok. So do I understand OSMF position is this: 1. There are no technical problems with having international boundaries overlapping and representing official position of involved countries. 2. International boundaries DO sometimes overlap. 3. OSMF is aware that overlapping boundaries would have satisfied more users (especially LOCAL users). 4. Precedence is taken by "most widely internationally recognised and best meets realities on the ground" where only second part is actually important, so this sentence should be changed to "best meets realities on the ground IRRESPECTIVE OF WIDE INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION". Is this correct? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
