> Vector tiles and customizable styling is not enough. > So we still need to represent the various viewpoints on disputed borders and territories within the OSM database itself
agree, ( sorry, I am not good at communication. :) ) as I wrote: Imho: an important part of the solution: - openstreetmap.org vector maps. ( so we can customize the borders, languages for the end users, communities ) - improved admin border tagging - more communication, adapting the rules for the current political situations. And I trust in DWG. Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. dec. 11., K, 16:41): > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:02 PM Imre Samu <pella.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> TLDR: We need focusing for the customizable vector tiles for the next >> year! ( Less community fighting - more working on the real problems! ) >> > > Vector tiles and customizable styling is not enough. AFAIK, we never use > 3rd-party data (except for the public domain Natural Earth data for the > lower zoom levels, IIRC) when rendering the default tile layer on the OSM. > So we still need to represent the various viewpoints on disputed borders > and territories within the OSM database itself if you want that level of > flexibility on the default tile layer(s). There are already a couple or so > threads on the Tagging mailing list discussing various tagging solutions > for representing these viewpoints and disputes. > > ~Eugene > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
