1st thing to do is to ask the napper to slow down in a change set comment.
Am 28. Mai 2019 17:13:49 MESZ schrieb Jmapb <jm...@gmx.com>:
>See yesterday's changesets:
>
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70676813 (
>https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=70676813 )
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70676888 (
>https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=70676888 )
>
>I believe this is just a casual user browsing around in iD and making
>the suggested changes it advises -- to about 1000 objects. These giant
>changesets are nearly impossible to review. My fear here is that iD's
>new validator will make QA extremely challenging in dense areas.
>
>Scrolling through the tag additions, these changesets look almost
>identical to the behavior of a bot... or rather like 6 or 7 bots
>operating at once. If they *had* been made by a bot that was following
>the mechanical edit guidelines, they could be comprehended and
>reviewed.
>But the various tagging changes are all mixed up together in a single
>changeset, along with whatever the mapper reidpelton's *actual* changes
>were -- if any.
>
>So how do I even begin to do QA on this? I don't see any options other
>than 1) mass-revert or 2) skip review of all large changesets that
>appear to be triggered by iD validation. Any other suggestions?
>
>Jason
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit Kaiten Mail gesendet.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
