On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 20:00 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Am Di., 28. Mai 2019 um 19:56 Uhr schrieb Dave F via talk < > talk@openstreetmap.org>: > > I notice these changesets were completed in 30/60 seconds > > respectively. > > > > I don't use iD. How is this possible? Does it have a JOSM like mass > > edit > > > > ability? > > > > > > > > I don't see asking users to split the changesets as a solution > > to > > > > what is the clear problem of mass adding/amending tags to > > > > unknown/undocumented ones. > > > > indeed, I see no way to judge whether the iD suggestion to change > objects from crossing=zebra to crossing=marked makes sense, because > there is no documentation of crossing=marked. Going by the words, > probably any zebra crossing can be seen as a marked crossing so it > may not be introducing errors, just reducing specificity/detail. > Just had a play with iD in my local High Street.
First edit was a minor one to tidy up a spurious line, iD made no attempt to change any other objects. Second edit was to add a tactile paving tag to one of the zebra crossings, it warned me that a marked crossing has outdated tags and wanted to loose valuable information. which I declined but it is easy to see how an inexperienced mapper could be coerced into making such a change. As you say marked is undocumented, and zebra is documented. Phil (trigpoint)
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk