For ATMs, at least, I would propose the opposite: add the atm=yes tag to all amenity=atm
>From a user perspective, I want to be able to search for atm=yes to obtain all the nearby ATMs. Removing this tag leaves me without standalone ATMs, so I would have to search for atm=yes OR amenity=atm Thus, I don't think this is duplicated information -- it is additional information. If this were 1965 and we needed to fit everything into 32K of memory, I'd say fine, but I don't see the need or the advantage. John On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 9:00 AM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> wrote: > Recently in mapping I encountered amenity=atm with atm=yes > > I manually removed atm=yes, but it turns that there is more of such > objects. > I propose to run an automatic edit that will remove atm=yes from all such > objects. > In addition I propose to remove also some other blatant and unnecessary > duplicates. > > So in total I propose to remove > > atm=yes from amenity=atm http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JW8 > transportation=fuel from amenity=fuel http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JWe > sustenance=restaurant from amenity=restaurant > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JWh > sustenance=fast_food from amenity=fast_food http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JWc > service=post_office from amenity=post_office > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JWa > > as this duplicated tags are unnecessary, unwanted, confusing and > undesirable. > Edits would be split to not create overly large bounding boxes. > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
