On 6/14/2019 9:50 AM, Dave F via talk wrote:
On 14/06/2019 14:10, Jmapb wrote:
If there's a problem with a well-thought-out mechanical edit, it's
highly likely to be localized,
For mechanical/bot/automated edits, errors are more likely to be
duplicated across all amendments.
If 'local mapping communities' have 'different ideas' it should be
queried as to what they are & why they're required.
Sure, when possible, but this is a belt-and-suspenders situation. The
automated edits code of conduct (
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Execute_with_caution
) is pretty clear about this:
- Execute only a small number of edits wait for feedback before
proceeding with larger edits.
- One changeset covering the whole planet is hard to read. Changes
grouped into small regions are easiest to digest for human mappers.
(paraphrased)
Jason
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
