On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:02:59 +0100 Dave F via talk <talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> On 14/06/2019 07:57, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > Edits would be split to not create overly large bounding boxes. > > As long as it's clearly commented, I wouldn't loose any sleep over > the physical size of the changeset. OSM should be concerning itself > with quality rather than quantity. > > That the main website is antiquated & unable to display details of > edits is not a reason to improve the database efficiently. Performing > edits in one go makes them easier to keep track of & revert, if > there's a problem. It's not just the main website. I'm not aware of any QA tool that makes it easy to review a planet-spanning changeset. -- Mark _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
