On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 6:19 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> speaking about risks, having an incomplete network of verified, correct > roads is probably more useful and less troublesome than an "overcomplete" > one which also contains non-existent roads (e.g. waterways interpreted as > roads) or shows connections that aren't there in reality. > I think this position should be a bit more nuanced. Taken to absurdity, OSM map with a one percent of roads is far worse than having 101% of the roads mapped with the help of AI with 1% of extras, because fixing that 1% is far less work than adding 99% by hand. I'm sure we can find a good balance between both positions. Thx! --Yuri
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
