11 Sep 2019, 13:43 by o...@imagico.de:
> On Wednesday 11 September 2019, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
>>
>> The main thing we're missing is curated, simple information on the
>> main tags that are _used_.
>>
>
> Indeed. And i would go even further: Any documentation of the de facto
> use of tags written by humans (i.e. that goes beyond automatic analysis
> like taginfo), written and maintained in a way that ensures it actually
> does document the de facto situation, would be immensely useful and
> important
>
Nearly 100% of my activity on wiki
is attempting to do this (documenting
tags and removal of what is in contrary to
reality).
>> It needs an
>> editor/curator/whatever, to have clear editorial guidelines, and
>> probably to run on the pull request model rather than open editing.
>>
>
> Is there any mature and writer centric software that implements this
> kind of model? I mean that from the perspective of a documentation
> author offers a wiki like functionality with decent preview and
> formatting but at the same time comes with a kind of version management
> and functions to facilitate editorial review and discussion.
>
wiki has version management and
talk pages.
editorial review equivalent is done via watchlists
MediaWiki software and OSM Wiki
community has plenty of warts
but I am unaware about real alternatives,
and I am not planning to make one.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
