W dniu 12.09.2019 o 07:02, Roland Olbricht pisze: > > Changing to a github-like system of version management > > I thought of Git, not Github. > > This is an important distinction: Git is as decentralized as possible - > whenever one works with a repo one gets the full data and history of the > project to the local disk drive.
There is also GitHub-like service called Gitlab (with Community Edition on a free license to be deployed on your own server), which is quite popular option for managing Git projects, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GitLab Since we talk here about iD editor design choices, I also wanted to mention OSM Carto (default map style which I'm involved in) as one of the important tools related to tagging. There are no simple relations between tagging and rendering department, for example lack of rendering some objects does not stop people from tagging them, but it certainly influences their choices in some way. Our team is pretty conservative in that regard - not only tagging has to be documented on wiki and the numbers should be substantial, but if there is one scheme, there's a resistance to deploy any other scheme which would duplicate it, which hinders the usage of any redesigned schemes (public transport comes to mind for example). Over the time the problem of scheme transitions will certainly go higher, so it's good to think about how should it be handled by rendering. BTW: Is there a chance to record and publish the discussion on the web? Currently it looks like it won't be recorded, but even unofficial recording done by participants would be interesting to me: https://2019.stateofthemap.org/sessions/PPTHFQ/ -- "Pojechałam truizmem, ale mogę, bo jestem trochę pierdołą" [P. Potocka] _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
