There seems to be a misunderstanding of the definition of "Derived". In
order for something to be considered derived it needs to contain some
elements from which it was derived. The end product described by
facebook contains no OSM data, therefore it is literally the opposite of
a derived product.
As far as licensing I can't comment on that.
On 11/14/2019 4:50 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
14 Nov 2019, 22:12 by yuriastrak...@gmail.com:
Let me get this straight:
* I create a dataset from public data sources, e.g a list of
roads, and publish it under the Public Domain dedication (i.e.
CC0).?? (I agree that MIT is weird here).
* Afterwards, I make a subset of my original data by removing any
roads I found elsewhere, e.g. in a proprietary source.
* And now you are saying that the new _subset_ of my original
public domain data is no longer public domain because I removed
values that exist??in a proprietary source?
Yes, it is a derivative work. (AFAIK)
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
