On Monday 30 December 2019, Nuno Caldeira wrote: > here's a interested case > https://www.gislounge.com/gis-data-high-resolution-global-hydrography >-dataset/amp/ are they allowed to share this on CC4? Shouldn't it only > be ODbL? are they allowed to share only after a registration? anyone > wanna try getting a copy of the derivated work as they need to > without registration?
Note this is a use case very different from the one discussed here *and* the producers of the data dual license it CC-BY-NC and ODbL. Details can be found on: http://hydro.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~yamadai/MERIT_Hydro/ This is similar in nature to a case i pointed out about two years ago: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2018-January/008648.html The question here is if something that is used in a database like fashion (i.e. that is semantically interpreted by algorithms) can be a produced work. Answering 'yes' to this question would - as i explained in the cited discussion - functionally abolish share-alike for much of the OSM data. So far LWG and OSMF board have avoided answering this question with a clear 'no' and instead tried to find a middle way between the two - see: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2019-August/008741.html -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk