Folks, I was being a bit tongue in cheek, obviously the point didn't get across. I apologize and re-state:
For many legal and marketing reasons providing attribution to "OSM" is not something that is likely ever going to be supported or recommended by the OSMF as sufficient. This is nothing new and has nothing to do with the proposed guideline outside of reducing the options. Simon Am 20.02.2020 um 00:44 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via talk: > > > > 19 Feb 2020, 21:05 by si...@poole.ch: > > > Am 19.02.2020 um 20:17 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via talk: >> 19 Feb 2020, 17:22 by dieterdre...@gmail.com >> <mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>: >> >> But I stick to the comment that 500px are far too many (=1000 >> actual retina pixels or 1500 px on a retina@3). >> >> Yes, you may easily fit at least "© OSM" >> with link in such space. > > Just that people don't get the wrong idea, using attributing to > OSM is completely out of the question, since when does Online > Soccer Manager distribute geo-data? > > Obviously, it is only ok when you are constrained > for space and there is actually no > space for longer text. > > If you have let's say 450 pixels then you > should use full name OpenStreetMap. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
