Am Do., 20. Feb. 2020 um 19:19 Uhr schrieb Christoph Hormann <o...@imagico.de >:
> On Thursday 20 February 2020, Simon Poole wrote: > For example it is later stated that > > > visible attribution is not required if "there is legal or safety or > > > privacy information that needs to be presented with similar or > > > greater prominence to attribution" - which at least in the EU is > > > always the case! > > > > So you agree with us that this is an actual external restraint that > > needs to be considered, and it is not the LWG succumbing to the > > interests of big $$$? > > No, the ODbL does not care about outside constraints - if you want to > use OSM data in a form that does not allow providing proper attribution > and complying with legal requirements at the same time then you may not > use OSM data at all. +1, nobody forces you to display privacy or safety or other legal information at the same time as the map or the map attribution. You could present this information before any map is shown. Or this other information could be shown in a popup / popover / alert like fashion. Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
